James Kirkup has a very astute observation inThree Line Whip blog published by The London Daily Telegraph about how to gauge the success of the G-20 summit that is to convene in London next week on April 2nd.
Kirkup writes: "The more you hear Mr Brown, Mr Obama and the rest talk about tax havens, the more they have failed to agree on more important things. No one likes tax havens. They're the low-hanging fruit of the G-20 process; saying rude things about the Swiss and the rest is pretty easy and uncontroversial. But it's also missing the point. This crisis didn't begin in Guernsey or the Caymans, it began in New York and London."
Orchestrated Anti-Tax Haven Blather
For weeks now the liberal world media dutifully has been repeating dire threats against so-called "tax havens" from the big spending, high taxing, anti-tax competition likes of Germany's Merkel and France's Sarkosy. Even President Obama allowed his less than impressive Secretary of the Treasury to make some noise against tax havens.
The orchestrated battle of words hurled at offshore financial centers got so heated that British PM Gordon Brown felt obliged to drastic demand for "the end of tax havens."
This belated anti-tax haven baloney comes from Her Majesty's first minister whose government is in charge (and has been for a decade) of the United Kingdom's many tax havens in its overseas territories (Bermuda, the Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands, the Turks & Caicos) and its Crown Dependencies (the Channel Islands of Jersey and Guernsey and the Isle of Man), plus Gibraltar.
Does the Rt. Hon. Gordon believe that the City of London really can absorb all the dispossessed refugee bankers and trust officer that will flood in from these British world-class financial centers if he and the G-20 high tax goons shut them down? (Some unprincipled candidates, desperate for re-election, will do just about anything for votes!)
Spend vs. Regulate
The proponents claimed the G-20 meeting was not only going to solve the international economic crisis, (either by more Obama stimulus spending, or forced global regulation), but for desert, the G-20 would serve the collective severed heads of all tax havens displayed on a platter.
This entire hypocritical anti-tax haven campaign, as I have oft noted, is but an extension of the phony blacklists that have streamed for years from the tax-exempt minions at the Paris headquarters of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), a taxpayer financed, pro-tax mouthpiece for the G-20 major nations who pay their salaries.
The OECD invented the blacklist and has used it skillfully as a public relations ploy to smear tax havens.
But in a classic case of removing the wind from the sails, the OECD blacklist ploy deflated when Switzerland, Austria, Luxembourg, Belgium, Hong Kong, Singapore, Liechtenstein, Andorra and Monaco, among others, all announced their agreement to broader but limited tax information exchange.
Even German foreign minister Steinbrueck, one of the most caustic anti-tax haven critic, has said he does not think G-20 leaders now would come up with a blacklist of tax havens. "As far as I see, there will be no such list at the London meeting," he said.
Despicable Communiqué
When I asked one the leading American tax experts, Dan Mitchell (left) of the Cato Institute, what he thought the G-20 outcome might be he said: "To be honest, I'm not sure what to expect from the G-20 meeting, other than a despicable communiqué attacking tax competition. My guess is that the real enemy is still the OECD, and the G-20 is just engaging in public relations warfare."
As The Telegraph's James Kirkup writes: "The transatlantic disagreement over stimulus vs. regulation isn't a full-blown row yet, but it's not far off, and the still-skeletal Obama administration has enough worries at home without looking for more abroad. Better for the president to play safe and sign something anodyne in London."
List Grows Long
The Swiss daily Tages Anzeiger reported that in a letter dated March 5 to British Chancellor Alistair Darling, OECD chief Angel Gurria provided an anti-tax haven blacklist including Switzerland and Singapore, as well as territories such as the Cayman Islands, Andorra and Montserrat.
The OECD branded 46 countries and territories for "insufficient progress" in meeting standards on tax cooperation and banking secrecy. (To the OECD that means an end to all financial privacy and automatic exchange of tax information among nations, as well as uniform higher taxes in all jurisdictions).
The OECD list also included Costa Rica, Chile, Grenada, Guatemala, Hong Kong, Liberia, Panama, the Philippines, San Marino and Uruguay, as well as Gibraltar, Guernsey and Jersey and a host of Pacific and Caribbean islands.
How Many Legions?
But as the brutal Soviet dictator, Josef Stalin was reportedly to have said about the influence of his enemy, His Holiness, the Pope: "How many legions does the Pope have?"
The Pope was said to have responded through Stalin's Foreign Minister, Molotov: "Tell your master he will meet my legions in Eternity."
Well, the OECD is loud and demanding, but it has neither any enforcement legions and certainly not any heavenly allies.
The Tax Haven Test
So remember that on April 2nd, if tax havens and offshore finance are anything more than a minor part of the "global new deal" struck in London, then the G-20 global economic meeting will have failed.
And no matter what the G-20 does, tax havens will still be with us, fortunately.
* To learn more about the economic benefits of tax havens, click here:
* To learn more about the moral case for tax havens, click here:
* To see why anti-tax haven demagoguery is misguided, click here:
Comments